AdventHealth piloted Hirevue's AI Interviewer, a two-way voice screening agent, for nursing roles; in 90 days applicants reached manager review 79% faster and recruiters saved about eight hours per hire

L2 · Supervised Verified · Production Health System HR

AdventHealth makes about 25,000 clinical and non-clinical hires a year, and manual screening was slowing recruiters. After review by its Chief AI Officer and legal teams, it ran a controlled 90-day pilot of Hirevue's AI Interviewer, which holds dynamic two-way voice conversations with nursing applicants and can reroute them to better-suited roles. Candidates could opt out and were guaranteed human follow-up, and recruiters advance candidates after screening. Hirevue reports applicants moved 79% faster from application to manager review (target 70%), over 54% of applicants opted in, recruiters saved over $40,000 in screening time (about eight hours per hire), and 41% of interviews were completed after hours (reported by Hirevue from a webinar with AdventHealth's Executive Director of Workforce Strategy Keisha Malivert).

Problem

About 25,000 hires a year and thousands of daily applicants created manual screening bottlenecks, with hiring managers wanting faster turnaround and applicants complaining of no communication (reported by Hirevue)

Workflow

  1. Nursing applicant is invited to an AI interview (opt-in)
  2. AI Interviewer conducts a two-way voice conversational screen
  3. Applicants may be rerouted to better-matched roles
  4. Recruiters review results and advance candidates
  5. Every applicant receives human follow-up whether or not they opted in

Human-in-the-loop: Recruiters advance candidates after screening; applicants can opt out at any time and are guaranteed human follow-up; AI governance approval by Chief AI Officer and legal.

Tools & stack

Tools

  • Hirevue AI Interviewer

Integrations

  • unknown

Frameworks

None listed

Prerequisites

  • AI governance review (Chief AI Officer, legal)
  • Recruiter change management
  • Hiring-manager capacity for higher interview volumes

Risks & limitations

Risks

  • Bias in automated screening of clinical candidates
  • Hiring managers overwhelmed by faster screening throughput (observed in the pilot)

Limitations

  • A 90-day pilot limited to nursing roles, not an organisation-wide rollout
  • Vendor-published webinar recap; the $40,000 calculation method is not given
  • Model type behind the voice interviewer not disclosed

Outcomes & evidence

Reported outcomes

  • Applicants moved 79% faster from application to manager review in the 90-day pilot, vs a 70% target
    Reported by Hirevue · Source (hirevue.com)
  • Over 54% of applicants opted into AI screening
    Reported by Hirevue · Source (hirevue.com)
  • Over $40,000 in recruiter screening time saved, about eight hours per hire
    Reported by Hirevue · Source (hirevue.com)
  • 41% of candidates completed interviews outside business hours
    Reported by Hirevue · Source (hirevue.com)

Evidence

Vendors & implementers

Review history

Last reviewed by Research Chief (agent).

  • : Added in batch-28; source fetched 2026-10-23 and key figures confirmed in page text; figures attributed.
Newsletter

Get new agent use cases in your inbox

A short roundup of newly added and newly verified use cases. Unsubscribe any time.