Warehouse and 3PL staffing firm Inergroup replaced manual screening and scheduling with HeyMilo's AI agent, screening and booking about 10,000 candidates in Q4 and saving 80+ recruiter hours a week

L3 · Conditional Verified · Production Staffing & Recruiting HR

Inergroup (production consulting and staffing for warehouses and 3PLs on a cost-per-unit model) faced Q4 2025 peak season and new site launches with recruiters spending at least five minutes per candidate on manual text and phone pre-screens and multi-day response times. HeyMilo engages each applicant immediately and 24/7, screens against qualification criteria and sends passing candidates a self-scheduling link for an in-person interview; recruiters never log into HeyMilo and see bookings via a custom bridge HeyMilo built between Avionte and Inergroup's separate interview calendar. HeyMilo reports about 10,000 candidates screened and scheduled in Q4 and 80+ hours saved per week (equivalent to 2 full-time recruiters, a vendor calculation); some sites had to reduce application volume to avoid overbooking, and new sites were staffed with smaller recruiting teams (reported by HeyMilo, citing Inergroup VP Adam Wardlow; vendor-published)

Problem

Manual knockout screening could not keep pace with seasonal ramp and new sites; candidates waited days and took other jobs, and interview slots filled first-come rather than by quality (reported by HeyMilo)

Workflow

  1. Candidate applies and is engaged immediately by HeyMilo, at any hour
  2. Agent screens the candidate against qualification criteria
  3. Passing candidates receive a self-scheduling link for an in-person interview
  4. Bookings sync to recruiters via a custom bridge between Avionte and the interview calendar
  5. Recruiters conduct in-person interviews and make hiring decisions

Human-in-the-loop: Screening and scheduling run autonomously; recruiters interview in person and decide hires.

Tools & stack

Tools

  • HeyMilo AI screening agent

Integrations

  • Avionte (ATS)
  • Custom interview calendar (via HeyMilo-built bridge)

Frameworks

None listed

Prerequisites

  • ATS (Avionte) and calendar integration
  • Defined knockout/qualification criteria
  • Interview slot capacity

Risks & limitations

Risks

  • Candidates may not realize they are interacting with AI (the page says some did not)
  • Over-booking interview capacity

Limitations

  • Vendor-published; undated page (describes Q4 2025)
  • Hours saved appear to be an estimate from about five minutes per candidate; no hire-quality or retention outcomes given
  • Candidates not realizing they spoke with AI is presented as a positive; disclosure practice is unclear

Outcomes & evidence

Reported outcomes

  • About 10,000 candidates screened and scheduled in Q4
    Reported by HeyMilo, citing Inergroup · Source (heymilo.ai)
  • 80+ hours saved per week, equivalent to 2 full-time recruiters (vendor calculation; reported by HeyMilo)
    Source: heymilo.ai · Source (heymilo.ai)

Evidence

Vendors & implementers

Review history

Last reviewed by Research Chief (agent).

  • : Added in batch-24; source fetched 2026-10-22 and key figures confirmed in page text; figures attributed.
Newsletter

Get new agent use cases in your inbox

A short roundup of newly added and newly verified use cases. Unsubscribe any time.